August 7, 2001

The Honourable Elizabeth Witmer
Minister of the Environment
135 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, Ontario M4V 1P5

Dear Minister Witmer,

Pollution Probe respectfully requests an extension to the comment period for the Ministry of the Environment’s proposed regulation for “Emissions Trading And NOx And SO2 Emission Limits For The Electricity Sector” (EBR Registry #RA01E0020). We also strongly urge the government to consult directly with the general public about this proposed regulation.

In the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario’s Guidance Document, entitled  Implementing the Environmental Bill of Rights: Environmental Registry Notice and Comment Procedures, there is an outline of what the Commissioner’s Office deems appropriate in terms of consultation.

The following points are made in reference to the length and timing of public consultations:

1.      That the Minister is given “the discretion to decide when to extend notice and comment periods.”

2.      That “The complexity of a proposal and level of public interest in a decision should guide ministries in determining the required level of public participation.”

3.      That “Ministries should also consider giving additional time to respond during holiday seasons such as December and the summer months.”

For proposals with a high level of complexity, such as this one, the Commissioner’s Office recommends a specific consultation procedure involving three stages. The following is a synopsis of these stages:

Stage 1 -          Initial posting of proposal on registry and detailed notice of consultations, and often additional public consultations, such as meetings, mailings or newspaper announcements;

Stage 2 -      Consultation with stakeholders by mail or meetings;

Stage 3 -             Proposal for preferred approach or option placed on Registry for comment period of at least 45-60 days.

Although there have been a series of consultation over the past several years about the general topic of emissions trading, it was not until the publication of the discussion paper entitled Emissions Reduction Trading System for Ontario (March 2001) that any details of Ontario’s Intentions became publicly available. It was not until July 31, 2001 that details of the regulation itself and the actual rules for the emissions trading system were posted on the EBR Registry.

It is appropriate and, we believe, essential during prime vacation time in the middle of Ontario’s smoggiest summer on record, that your Ministry provide more opportunity for public consultation on a plan that has as diverse a group of concerned commenters as this one does. We understand that 61 different groups commented on the discussion paper. Pollution Probe has received a copy of these submissions, many of which are very substantive, and we would appreciate time to review and consider the points raised by important stakeholders.  

A brief synopsis of concerns expressed by stakeholders on the discussion paper included : 

-      The U.S. EPA, who know a great deal about emissions trading, is concerned that Ontario’s approach has the potential to undermine U.S. trading systems, and is skeptical about the prospect of allowing cross-border trading if Ontario goes ahead with the approach outlined in the discussion paper.

-      Environment Canada has suggested that Ontario’s proposal does not comply with the Canada – U.S. Ozone Annex Agreement, because it will significantly increase electricity sector NOx emissions.

-      Pollution Probe and other ENGOs believe that if there are no limits on the overall emissions (e.g., emission caps) from non-electricity emitters, the electricity sector should not be allowed to use credits created by these sources to offset their emissions, because there is every likelihood that overall emissions will increase.

We request that you move cautiously on this proposal. More consultation time will provide the government with an opportunity to ensure that the initial stakeholder comments are properly understood and responded to and that both the business and environmental implications of the proposed emissions trading system have been properly evaluated.

 Yours truly,

 

Ken Ogilvie

Executive Director

cc:  The Honourable Jim Wilson, Minister of Energy, Science and Technology

Gord Miller, Environmental Commissioner for Ontario

David McRobert, In-House Counsel & Senior Policy Advisor, Office of the  Environmental Commissioner of Ontario

  

   
 

 | |